Title and statement of responsibility area
Title proper
General material designation
Parallel title
Other title information
Title statements of responsibility
Title notes
Level of description
Reference code
Edition area
Edition statement
Edition statement of responsibility
Class of material specific details area
Statement of scale (cartographic)
Statement of projection (cartographic)
Statement of coordinates (cartographic)
Statement of scale (architectural)
Issuing jurisdiction and denomination (philatelic)
Dates of creation area
Date(s)
Physical description area
Physical description
Publisher's series area
Title proper of publisher's series
Parallel titles of publisher's series
Other title information of publisher's series
Statement of responsibility relating to publisher's series
Numbering within publisher's series
Note on publisher's series
Archival description area
Name of creator
Administrative history
The American Eugenics Party (AEP) was a right-wing organization that used eugenics and scientific racism to justify its beliefs and political platform. Founded in Los Angeles, California in the 1960s, AEP meetings were held in Long Beach and Santa Barbara. Members of the party included Samuel Andrisani, primary spokesperson and Education Manager; John S. Vanders, public relations manager; and Robert Henderon, chairman of the race relations committee.
Tenets of the AEP's platform included the importance of racial purity, anti-immigration legislation, the intention to unite all "Caucasian stocks" to fight against the "non-Caucasian genetic threat", limiting government positions to those who pass an AEP test, "incentive economics", limited roles for women, neutrality on the concept of God, access to education based on "hereditary mental ability", limiting media on "dysgenic acts", removing "white defectives" (white people who are not eugenicists) from political positions, eliminating violence-type sports such as boxing, enacting anti-vice laws, enacting environmental legislation, and ensuring only "eugenic marriages" (marriages in which the couple are matched in terms of race, intellect, etc.).
Custodial history
Scope and content
Publication from the American Eugenics Party on the eugenics based "scientific information" on what race is the ugliest. The publication's first point is that there has been a degeneration of standards in society when it comes to beauty. The three reasons given are that beauty has been defined as a function and all ugliness is labelled as beautiful, that distortion and unreality has been considered beautiful, and that clichés such as "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" are used. The AEP posits that there are universal eugenic standards and that those who possess "a normal sensory mechanism" can determine beauty from ugliness. Normal sensory mechanisms have definite limitations and the preference is for balance, which equates to beauty.
The basic eugenic program is designed to "promote and preserve universal beauty standards" and those standards show that Caucasians are the superior race in terms of beauty, whereas "Negros" are the inferior race in terms of beauty. The AEP justification for this is that there are over 200 differences in appearance between Caucasians and "Negros" and that in all cases the Caucasian appearance is superior. One of the key factors in determining which features are better seems to be an idea of middle ground, or balance. For instance, a grading scale shows Caucasians in the middle in terms of skin colour with "Negros" on one end and "Albinos" on the other - both of which are considered deficient as they are on the extremes of the spectrum.
The publication devotes sections to skin colour, facial features, head shape, hair type, skin structure, and body type. In each section, examples are given as to why Caucasian features are superior, such as: Black people's skin colour makes teeth and eyes appear too white, Black is a depressing colour and spiritually is a sign of evil, larger lips and noses mean that the facial features are not in balance, the cephalic index is off, that "Negro hair" is wool like and therefore closer to animals, that "Negro skin" is too smooth and therefore gives the appearance of being slimy, and that "Negro" buttocks are larger so that they can serve as storage tanks for water.
The conclusion is that the "Negro race" appearance violates the "Universal Beauty Law" (not too predominant or too subdued for the value assigned to the parts of a whole). The publication goes on to discuss other negatives of the "Negro race" such as lack of having built civilizations, deficiency in reasoning, prominence of sickle cell, an unpleasant voice, body weaknesses, and body odour.
Notes area
Physical condition
Immediate source of acquisition
Purchased in 2025 from David Anthem, Bookseller.
Arrangement
Language of material
English
Script of material
Location of originals
Availability of other formats
Restrictions on access
Terms governing use, reproduction, and publication
Finding aids
Associated materials
Accruals
General note
The concept of races is a tenet of scientific racism, or biological racism, a pseudo-scientific belief that humans can be divided into so-called races, and that there is scientific evidence that supports racial superiority.
General note
Materials in this collection express racist, sexist and ableist views rooted in eugenics, the belief that the genetic makeup of the human population can be improved by limiting the ability of people deemed inferior from reproducing. There are derogatory statements and depictions throughout these publications that may be deeply upsetting and unsettling. These materials are being shared and maintained as they were created in keeping with Special Collections & Archives’ approach to language in archival descriptions, which prioritizes speaking openly about and clearly identifying problematic, harmful, and otherwise offensive records in the department’s holdings. This approach, while potentially upsetting, allows for the critical assessment and questioning of historical material by contemporary researchers.
Alternative identifier(s)
Standard number
Standard number
Access points
Subject access points
Place access points
Name access points
Genre access points
Control area
Description record identifier
Institution identifier
Rules or conventions
Status
Level of detail
Dates of creation, revision and deletion
Created by JB Nov. 2025
Language of description
English