File 7 - The ugliest race.

Title and statement of responsibility area

Title proper

The ugliest race.

General material designation

    Parallel title

    Other title information

    Title statements of responsibility

    Title notes

    Level of description

    File

    Reference code

    SCA545-GA546-7

    Edition area

    Edition statement

    Edition statement of responsibility

    Class of material specific details area

    Statement of scale (cartographic)

    Statement of projection (cartographic)

    Statement of coordinates (cartographic)

    Statement of scale (architectural)

    Issuing jurisdiction and denomination (philatelic)

    Dates of creation area

    Date(s)

    Physical description area

    Physical description

    Publisher's series area

    Title proper of publisher's series

    Parallel titles of publisher's series

    Other title information of publisher's series

    Statement of responsibility relating to publisher's series

    Numbering within publisher's series

    Note on publisher's series

    Archival description area

    Name of creator

    ([196-]-[197-])

    Administrative history

    The American Eugenics Party (AEP) was a right-wing organization that used eugenics and scientific racism to justify its beliefs and political platform. Founded in Los Angeles, California in the 1960s, AEP meetings were held in Long Beach and Santa Barbara. Members of the party included Samuel Andrisani, primary spokesperson and Education Manager; John S. Vanders, public relations manager; and Robert Henderon, chairman of the race relations committee.

    Tenets of the AEP's platform included the importance of racial purity, anti-immigration legislation, the intention to unite all "Caucasian stocks" to fight against the "non-Caucasian genetic threat", limiting government positions to those who pass an AEP test, "incentive economics", limited roles for women, neutrality on the concept of God, access to education based on "hereditary mental ability", limiting media on "dysgenic acts", removing "white defectives" (white people who are not eugenicists) from political positions, eliminating violence-type sports such as boxing, enacting anti-vice laws, enacting environmental legislation, and ensuring only "eugenic marriages" (marriages in which the couple are matched in terms of race, intellect, etc.).

    Custodial history

    Scope and content

    Publication from the American Eugenics Party on the eugenics based "scientific information" on what race is the ugliest. The publication's first point is that there has been a degeneration of standards in society when it comes to beauty. The three reasons given are that beauty has been defined as a function and all ugliness is labelled as beautiful, that distortion and unreality has been considered beautiful, and that clichés such as "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" are used. The AEP posits that there are universal eugenic standards and that those who possess "a normal sensory mechanism" can determine beauty from ugliness. Normal sensory mechanisms have definite limitations and the preference is for balance, which equates to beauty.

    The basic eugenic program is designed to "promote and preserve universal beauty standards" and those standards show that Caucasians are the superior race in terms of beauty, whereas "Negros" are the inferior race in terms of beauty. The AEP justification for this is that there are over 200 differences in appearance between Caucasians and "Negros" and that in all cases the Caucasian appearance is superior. One of the key factors in determining which features are better seems to be an idea of middle ground, or balance. For instance, a grading scale shows Caucasians in the middle in terms of skin colour with "Negros" on one end and "Albinos" on the other - both of which are considered deficient as they are on the extremes of the spectrum.

    The publication devotes sections to skin colour, facial features, head shape, hair type, skin structure, and body type. In each section, examples are given as to why Caucasian features are superior, such as: Black people's skin colour makes teeth and eyes appear too white, Black is a depressing colour and spiritually is a sign of evil, larger lips and noses mean that the facial features are not in balance, the cephalic index is off, that "Negro hair" is wool like and therefore closer to animals, that "Negro skin" is too smooth and therefore gives the appearance of being slimy, and that "Negro" buttocks are larger so that they can serve as storage tanks for water.

    The conclusion is that the "Negro race" appearance violates the "Universal Beauty Law" (not too predominant or too subdued for the value assigned to the parts of a whole). The publication goes on to discuss other negatives of the "Negro race" such as lack of having built civilizations, deficiency in reasoning, prominence of sickle cell, an unpleasant voice, body weaknesses, and body odour.

    Notes area

    Physical condition

    Immediate source of acquisition

    Purchased in 2025 from David Anthem, Bookseller.

    Arrangement

    Language of material

    • English

    Script of material

      Location of originals

      Availability of other formats

      Restrictions on access

      Terms governing use, reproduction, and publication

      Finding aids

      Associated materials

      Related materials

      Accruals

      General note

      The concept of races is a tenet of scientific racism, or biological racism, a pseudo-scientific belief that humans can be divided into so-called races, and that there is scientific evidence that supports racial superiority.

      General note

      Materials in this collection express racist, sexist and ableist views rooted in eugenics, the belief that the genetic makeup of the human population can be improved by limiting the ability of people deemed inferior from reproducing. There are derogatory statements and depictions throughout these publications that may be deeply upsetting and unsettling. These materials are being shared and maintained as they were created in keeping with Special Collections & Archives’ approach to language in archival descriptions, which prioritizes speaking openly about and clearly identifying problematic, harmful, and otherwise offensive records in the department’s holdings. This approach, while potentially upsetting, allows for the critical assessment and questioning of historical material by contemporary researchers.

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Standard number

      Standard number

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Name access points

      Genre access points

      Control area

      Description record identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules or conventions

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation, revision and deletion

      Created by JB Nov. 2025

      Language of description

      • English

      Script of description

        Sources

        Accession area